Over the past decade, the UK has embarked on a rapid transition toward renewables, and political debate often centres on how that transition affects energy bills for both consumers and businesses. To understand the financial drivers behind those bills, one must start with the Contracts for Difference (CfDs) mechanism and the role of the Low Carbon Contracts Company (LCCC). Introduced under Electricity Market Reform in 2013, these remain critical levers for encouraging private investment in low-carbon energy and key to how the costs of the energy transition are allocated.
How CfDs work
A Contract for Difference (CfD) is a private contract between a low-carbon electricity generator (e.g. wind, solar) and the government owned LCCC. Under a CfD, a strike price is agreed for each unit of electricity over the contract term (typically 15–20 years). If the wholesale market price falls below that strike price, the LCCC pays the generator the difference. Conversely, if the market price is above the strike price, the generator pays back the difference to the LCCC.
This arrangement lowers revenue risk and cost of capital for renewable projects by providing revenue certainty over long periods. CfDs thus help scale up low-carbon generation capacity with more investor confidence. The CfD payments (and repayments) are recovered by LCCC through a levy on electricity suppliers, which is passed through into consumer bills.
Who pays and how costs flow to bills
The LCCC levy is applied to electricity suppliers who then incorporate the net CfD cost into consumer bills. When wholesale prices rise significantly, some CfD contracts yield rebate flows (i.e. generators paying back) which can reduce the net levy. The next round of CfD contracts (Allocation Round 7) are expected to be set at around £78/MWh for solar and £95/MWh for onshore wind. This compares with the current spot price of wholesale electricity which is fluctuating at around £95/MWh at the time of writing this article.
Many CfD strike prices are expressed in “real” terms (i.e. indexed to inflation) or contain indexation clauses. In times of high inflation, these indexing effects can cause strike‐price obligations to ratchet higher over time.
Further, as the CfD portfolio grows (more projects under contract), the total magnitude of levy flows (positive or negative) increases. In years of elevated wholesale prices, some contracts become net payers into the system, helping reduce the overall levy burden.
Other cost drivers beyond CfDs
While CfDs affect the generation side, they don’t cover the full cost of integrating renewables into the power system which is affected by many other factors including:
Grid infrastructure upgrades:
Accommodating many dispersed generators (especially in remote or weak network zones) often requires reinforcing transmission and distribution lines, adding new substations, and grid management assets. Estimates suggest up to £100bn of investment will be needed over the next 10 years (OFGEM), which will eventually affect bills through network charges.
System stability and balancing services:
Ancillary services, storage, inertia compensation, frequency control, smart inverters and demand side response all incur costs which must be borne by the system.
Wholesale gas prices as the benchmark:
Even though CfDs apply to renewable generators, the wholesale electricity price is still strongly influenced by marginal gas generation, which in turn sets the strike price expectations for CfDs. If gas prices were to fall significantly, reducing wholesale electricity costs, it won’t necessarily lead to lower energy bills for consumers as CfD’s will still be entitled to their agreed strike price creating inertia on the retail electricity price.
Because of these overlapping cost pressures, consumers are likely to continue seeing elevated energy bills, though the structure of what is paid for (commodity vs system support vs network) may evolve.
Technological barriers and challenges
Many people view renewable energy as an endless, “free” resource. In practice, the transition to a fully green energy system is far more complex. It requires extensive infrastructure, sophisticated grid management, and sustained investment.
Spain offers an instructive example. With limited domestic oil and gas reserves, its government began an aggressive push toward renewables in the early 2000s. By 2025, Spain has built over 35 GW of installed solar capacity distributed across tens of thousands of installations, from rooftop panels to large-scale solar farms. While this expansion has transformed Spain into a European leader in renewables, it has also introduced new operational challenges for the national grid.
A key technical issue lies in how renewable energy interacts with existing electricity networks. Solar photovoltaic systems generate direct current (DC), which must be converted into alternating current (AC) the form used in power grids via inverters. Wind turbines, on the other hand, typically generate AC but still rely on advanced power electronics for grid connection and control. These conversion and control processes are vital to maintaining grid stability as large numbers of renewable generators feed energy into the system simultaneously.
On 28 April 2025, Spain experienced a nationwide blackout that also affected parts of southern France. Preliminary investigations by the grid operator Red Eléctrica de España (REE) found that multiple interacting failures including poor voltage control, system planning weaknesses, and operational errors at a large solar installation triggered a cascading collapse of power supply. Although renewables were not the sole cause, the event highlighted the technical and managerial challenges of integrating high proportion of variable generation into complex grid systems.
For the UK, the lesson is clear: expanding renewable capacity must go hand-in-hand with investment in grid infrastructure, system control technology, and real-time stability management to ensure a secure, resilient supply as the energy mix evolves
Summary and outlook
The path to Net Zero by 2050 is paved with technological, financial and regulatory challenges. The UK’s use of CfDs has been instrumental in unlocking private investment, but it also means a portion of the cost (or benefit) of those contracts is passed to consumers via the LCCC levy. Meanwhile, the scale-up of renewables demands parallel investment in grid infrastructure, system services and stability mechanisms.
Consumers should expect energy costs to remain under pressure during the transition. However, with careful policy design, transparent levies, strong grid reinforcements, market innovation in storage and ancillary services, and resilience planning, those costs can be more predictable and tied to long-term societal value (lower carbon emissions, energy security). The blackout in Iberia reminds us that integration matters as much as generation.
Contact Our Experts
